Traveling art exhibits. Deep-sea recovery excursions. A Broadway musical; before that, the greatest film blockbuster of all time. Or, as playwright Jeffrey Hatcher puts it in his notes on
Why this endless nostalgia for a disaster we never knew?
In Act 2’s production of Hatcher’s play, a woman (Emma O’Donnell) appears stranded on an ice floe in the
John (Peter Schmitz), a descendant of one who perished on the voyage, brings her to a secluded location, bent on discovering her identity, somehow knowing that it contains the key to his own. And there begins one of the most compelling psychological mysteries I’ve seen on stage.
O’Donnell and Schmitz captivate as the interrogator and interrogated. She give
And that’s the kick in this production—waiting for it to end, not to understand it, but to know what has happened and why. In this respect, Alan Blumenthal’s direction i
Hatcher’s play frustrates, irritates, and captivates—but the urgency is yours, not his, and he knows it, drawing the story along, adding a new layer of mystery underneath each one that the plot strip
Not who are these characters, but who are we? The real fascination with the Titanic is that we all do what John does in the play—define ourselves in relation to how we think we’d act in a disaster that demands either extreme courage or abject cowardice. In this, the play reveals the untested answer
And what the play shows is that most of the time, if we were somehow transported back to the recurrence of a catastrophe (like the Titanic), we just might see that we’re trapped in the hull of a ship, no longer bounded by what we’d like to believe of ourselves, but by the truth, slowly sinking into an icy sea.
What would you have done on the deck of that fated ship? See this play, then think again.
1 comment:
Well said.
Post a Comment